Sexual dimorphism with female demographic dominance: Age, size, and sex ratio at maturation

Authors
Citation
Ph. Crowley, Sexual dimorphism with female demographic dominance: Age, size, and sex ratio at maturation, ECOLOGY, 81(9), 2000, pp. 2592-2605
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00129658 → ACNP
Volume
81
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2592 - 2605
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(200009)81:9<2592:SDWFDD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Under the influence of natural and sexual selection, males and females will often differ in the costs and benefits of achieving some particular body s ize; we might therefore expect to find them growing at different rates for different times, and dying on different schedules. The analysis of sexual d imorphism presented here assumes that life histories are optimized over thr ee key variables: activity level (or "effort") during the juvenile stage, d uration of the juvenile stage, and size at maturation. Reproduction is take n to be semelparous (or monocarpic), reproductive success is size dependent , and females are demographically dominant. Juvenile male and female life h istories are assumed to be "structurally identical" (i.e., governed by iden tical functions of activity, size, and development time). Under these condi tions, sexually dimorphic life histories readily arise when features of juv enile behavior and development are adjusted to maximize r in response to ge nder-specific selection pressures on adults. Some conclusions from the analysis are as follows: 1) Seasonal constraints that force males and females to have equal developm ent times cause differences between the sexes in other characteristics. 2) The survival cost of greater body size generates a sex ratio at maturati on favoring the smaller sex, consistent with much empirical evidence. 3) The relationships among size, growth rate, and development time can be r epresented graphically in a way that permits sexually dimorphic life histor ies to be depicted and compared. Cases considered here indicate considerabl e diversity among these patterns. 4) An allometric growth function is derived to facilitate graphical and mat hematical analysis of body size. 5) The reproductive size quotient, an indicator of reproductive potential r elative to body size, is defined and shown to be a significant life history characteristic. Except when mortality rate is strongly related to size at maturation, or when generation time is fixed, the reproductive size quotien t should be maximized, and these maxima should be the same for males and fe males.