The diagnostic goals in nonsurgical (conservative) epileptology differ from
presurgical diagnostic aims. The resulting development of diagnostic metho
ds in a tertiary-level epilepsy center is shown and the major technical and
organizational consequences of this difference for diagnostic longterm mon
itoring (LTM) as opposed to presurgical LTM are investigated. A total of 13
3 consecutive daytime LTM investigations using radio telemetry were reviewe
d and seizure parameters such as type, duration, method of seizure detectio
n, and need of mobility were evaluated and compared to presurgical LTM. Com
pared to presurgical LTM, partial seizures were relatively rare (17.8%) and
shea epileptic or nonepileptic motor events lasting <1 s, such as myocloni
c, atonic, short tonic seizures, spasms, ties, or startle reactions, are fr
equent (34.9%). Of all seizures, 23% had no or minor ictal EEG changes, sub
tle symptomatology without signaling by a patient or accompanying person, a
nd could be detected only by continuous online surveillance by an experienc
ed EEG technician. Due to the nature of the patient population in diagnosti
c LTM, there is an increased need for ictal and interictal mobility (radio
telemetry). LTM in conservative epileptology requires more intense human su
rveillance for seizure detection and increased patient mobility compared to
presurgical LTM.