T. Kauppinen et al., Improvement of brain perfusion SPET using iterative reconstruction with scatter and non-uniform attenuation correction, EUR J NUCL, 27(9), 2000, pp. 1380-1386
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Filtered back-projection (FBP) is generally used as the reconstruction meth
od for single-photon emission tomography although it produces noisy images
with apparent streak artefacts. It is possible to improve the image quality
by using an algorithm with iterative correction steps. The iterative recon
struction technique also has an additional benefit in that computation of a
ttenuation correction can be included in the process. A commonly used itera
tive method, maximum-likelihood expectation maximisation (ML-EM), can be ac
celerated using ordered subsets (OS-EM). We have applied to the OS-EM algor
ithm a Bayesian one-step late correction method utilising median root prior
(MRP). Methodological comparison was per formed by means of measurements o
btained with a brain perfusion phantom and using patient data. The aim of t
his work was to quantitate the accuracy of iterative reconstruction with sc
atter and non-uniform attenuation corrections and post-filtering in SPET br
ain perfusion imaging. SPET imaging was performed using a triple-head gamma
camera with fan-beam collimators, Transmission and emission scans were acq
uired simultaneously. The brain phantom used was a high-resolution three-di
mensional anthropomorphic JB003 phantom. Patient studies were performed in
ten chronic pain syndrome patients. The images were reconstructed using con
ventional FBP and iterative OS-EM and MRP techniques including scatter and
nonuniform attenuation corrections. Iterative reconstructions were individu
ally post-filtered. The quantitative results obtained with the brain perfus
ion phantom were compared with the known actual contrast ratios. The calcul
ated difference from the true values was largest with the FBP method; itera
tively reconstructed images proved closer to the reality. Similar findings
were obtained in the patient studies. The plain OS-FM method improved the c
ontrast whereas in the case of the MRP technique the improvement in contras
t was not so evident with post-filtering.