Rd. Mooi et Gd. Johnson, DISMANTLING THE TRACHINOIDEI - EVIDENCE OF A SCORPAENOID RELATIONSHIPFOR THE CHAMPSODONTIDAE, Ichthyological research, 44(2), 1997, pp. 143-176
An examination of the osteology and myology of the Champsodontidae rev
eals a number of apomorphic features (e.g., double-headed palatine, la
rge pelvic radial, epaxial muscle inserting on the medial pelvic-fin r
ay, posterior levator internus inserting on the third epibranchial). T
he evidence for a Champsodontidae/Chiasmodontidae relationship is exam
ined through a re-evaluation of the basal characters used to define th
e suborder Trachinoidei. The Champsodontidae are removed from the Trac
hinoidei and a chiasmodontid sister relationship is rejected. After in
vestigation of several possible alternative relationships (Paracanthop
terygii, Gobioidei, Callionymoidei, Kurtoidei, Apogonidae, Blennioidei
, Trichodontidae), champsodontids are hypothesized to be members of th
e perciform suborder Scorpaenoidei. This hypothesis is based largely o
n the synapomorphy of a parietal spine with an opening for passage of
the supratemporal sensory canal, a unique condition of champsodontids
and some scorpaenoids. A shared Type 1 epaxial muscle morphology, with
separate fibre insertions on the distal tips of the spine-bearing dor
sal-fin pterygiophores, is unusual and probably derived among percifor
ms. Champsodontids also share with some scorpaenoids Type 5 spinoid sc
ales and the origin of Baudelot's ligament from the first vertebra rat
her than the basi-occipital, although neither of these features is uni
que to these taxa. The occurrence of an enclosed sensory canal on the
parietals of Trichodontidae suggest that their relationships might als
o lie with the Scorpaenoidei. Arguments pertaining to the removal of c
hampsodontids from the trachinoids apply equally to the hypothesized m
embership of the Cheimarrichthyidae, Pinguipedidae, Percophididae, Tri
chonotidae, Creediidae, Chiasmodontidae, and notothenioids in the Trac
hinoidei. Inclusion of these taxa within the Trachinoidei is not well-
supported, and their relationships require further investigation.