EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Citation
Hr. Mertz et al., EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, GASTROIN EN, 52(3), 2000, pp. 367-371
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
367 - 371
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(200009)52:3<367:EPACSF>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background: Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be diff icult. Computed tomography (CT) is the standard, noninvasive imaging method for evaluation of suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but it has limited sensitivity for diagnosis, local staging, and metastases, Endoscopic ultras ound (EUS) and fluoro-deoxyglucose/position emission tomography (FDG-PET) a re imaging methods that may improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Thirty-five patients with presumed resectable pancreatic adenocarc inoma were prospectively evaluated with helical CT, EUS, and FDG-PET. Results: Sensitivity for the detection of pancreatic cancer was higher for EUS (93%) and FDG-PET (87%) than for CT (53%), EUS was more sensitive than CT for local vascular invasion of the portal and superior mesenteric veins, EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion was associated with poor outcome after surgery, EUS-guided, fine-needle aspiration allowed tissue diagnosis in 14 of 21 attempts (67%), FDG-PET diagnosed 7 of 9 cases of proven metastatic d isease, 4 of which were missed by CT. Two of three metastatic liver lesions suspected by CT were indeterminate for metastases. FDG-PET confirmed metas tases. Conclusions: EUS and PET improve diagnostic capability in pancreatic adenoc arcinoma, EUS is useful in determining local vascular invasion and obtainin g tissue diagnosis, FDG-PET is useful in identifying metastatic disease. Bo th techniques are more sensitive than helical CT for identification of the primary tumor.