IN-VITRO IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF DRUG-RELEASE AND POLYMER EROSION FROM BIODEGRADABLE P(FAD-SA) POLYANHYDRIDES - A NONINVASIVE APPROACH BY THECOMBINED USE OF ELECTRON-PARAMAGNETIC-RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY AND NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
K. Mader et al., IN-VITRO IN-VIVO COMPARISON OF DRUG-RELEASE AND POLYMER EROSION FROM BIODEGRADABLE P(FAD-SA) POLYANHYDRIDES - A NONINVASIVE APPROACH BY THECOMBINED USE OF ELECTRON-PARAMAGNETIC-RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY AND NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING, Pharmaceutical research, 14(6), 1997, pp. 820-826
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare drug release and pol
ymer erosion from biodegradable P(FAD-SA) polyanhydrides in vitro and
in vivo in real time and with minimal disturbance of the investigated
system. Methods. P(FAD-SA) 20:80 and P(FAD-SA) 50:50 polymer tablets w
ere loaded with the spin probe 3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-pyrrollid
ine-1-oxyl (PCA) and implanted subcutaneously in the neck of rats or p
laced in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. 1.1 GHz EPR spectroscopy experiments
and 7T MRI studies (T1 and T2 weighted) were performed. Results. A fro
nt of water penetration was visible by MRI in vitro in the case of P(F
AD-SA) 20:80, but not for P(FAD-SA) 50:50. For both polymers, the thic
kness of the tablets decreased with time and a insoluble, easy deforma
ble residue remained. Important processes such as edema, deformation o
f the implant, encapsulation and bioresorption were observable by MRI
in vivo. P(FAD-SA) 50:50 was almost entirely absorbed by day 44, where
as an encapsulated residue was found for P(FAD-SA) 20:80 after 65 days
. The EPR studies gave direct evidence of a water penetration induced
changes of the microenvironment inside the tablet. EPR signals were st
ill detectable in P(FAD-SA) 20:80 implants after 65 days, while the ni
troxide was released in vitro within 16 days. Conclusions. Important p
arameters and processes such as edema, deformation of the tablet, micr
oviscosity inside the tablet and encapsulation can be monitored in rea
l time by the combined use of the noninvasive techniques MRI and EPR l
ending to better understanding of the differences between the in vitro
and in vivo situation.