Peach tree growth, yield, and profitability as influenced by tree form andtree density

Citation
Rp. Marini et Ds. Sowers, Peach tree growth, yield, and profitability as influenced by tree form andtree density, HORTSCIENCE, 35(5), 2000, pp. 837-842
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
HORTSCIENCE
ISSN journal
00185345 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
837 - 842
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-5345(200008)35:5<837:PTGYAP>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
'Norman' peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] trees were trained to the centr al-leader or open-vase form and were planted at high (740 trees/ha), or low (370 trees/ha) density. A third density treatment was a HIGH --> LOW densi ty, where alternate trees in high-density plots were removed after 6 Sears to produce a low-density treatment. From 3 to 5 Sears after planting, trunk cross-sectional areas (TCA) increased most for low-density trees. After 9 years, TCA was greatest for low-density and least for high-density trees. B ecause of differences in tree training, central-leader trees were taller th an open-vase trees and tree spread was greater for low-density than for hig h-density trees. Annual yield per hectare was 15 % to 40% greater for high- density treatments than for low-density treatments, but tree form had littl e influence on yield. Average fruit weight tended to be greater for low-den sity than for high-density treatments, but cumulative marketable yield was greatest for high-density and lowest for HIGH --> LOW treatments. Income mi nus costs for 9 years was nearly $4200/ha higher, and net present value was about $2200/ha higher, for open-vase than for central-leader trees (P = 0. 08). Cumulative net present value for the 9 years was about $2660/ha higher for high- than for low-density trees (P = 0.36).