Rp. Marini et Ds. Sowers, Peach tree growth, yield, and profitability as influenced by tree form andtree density, HORTSCIENCE, 35(5), 2000, pp. 837-842
'Norman' peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] trees were trained to the centr
al-leader or open-vase form and were planted at high (740 trees/ha), or low
(370 trees/ha) density. A third density treatment was a HIGH --> LOW densi
ty, where alternate trees in high-density plots were removed after 6 Sears
to produce a low-density treatment. From 3 to 5 Sears after planting, trunk
cross-sectional areas (TCA) increased most for low-density trees. After 9
years, TCA was greatest for low-density and least for high-density trees. B
ecause of differences in tree training, central-leader trees were taller th
an open-vase trees and tree spread was greater for low-density than for hig
h-density trees. Annual yield per hectare was 15 % to 40% greater for high-
density treatments than for low-density treatments, but tree form had littl
e influence on yield. Average fruit weight tended to be greater for low-den
sity than for high-density treatments, but cumulative marketable yield was
greatest for high-density and lowest for HIGH --> LOW treatments. Income mi
nus costs for 9 years was nearly $4200/ha higher, and net present value was
about $2200/ha higher, for open-vase than for central-leader trees (P = 0.
08). Cumulative net present value for the 9 years was about $2660/ha higher
for high- than for low-density trees (P = 0.36).