Control of bacterial spot on tomato in the greenhouse and field with h-mutant bacteriophages

Citation
Je. Flaherty et al., Control of bacterial spot on tomato in the greenhouse and field with h-mutant bacteriophages, HORTSCIENCE, 35(5), 2000, pp. 882-884
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
HORTSCIENCE
ISSN journal
00185345 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
882 - 884
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-5345(200008)35:5<882:COBSOT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
A mixture of host-range mutant (h-mutant) bacteriophages specific for tomat o race 1 (T1) and race 3 (T3) of the bacterial spot pathogen, Xanthomonas c ampestris pv, vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye was evaluated for biological control of bacterial spot on 'Sunbeam' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) tran splants and field-grown plants for two seasons (Fall 1997 and Fall 1998), F oliar applications of bacteriophages were compared with similar application s of water (control) and of copper/mancozeb bactericides, the commonly used chemical control strategy for tomato seedling and field production. In 199 7, the incidence of bacterial spot on greenhouse-grown seedlings was reduce d from 40.5% (control) to 5.5% or 0.9% for bactericide- or bacteriophage-tr eated plants, respectively. In 1998, the incidence of bacterial spot was 17 .4 % on control plants vs. 5.5 % and 2.7% for bactericide- and bacteriophag e-treated plants, respectively, although these differences were not statist ically significant at P less than or equal to 0.05, Applications of bacteri ophages to field-grown tomatoes decreased disease severity as measured by t he area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) by 17.5% (1997) and 16.8% (1998) compared with untreated control plants. Preharvest plant vigor ratin gs, taken twice during each field season, were higher in the bacteriophage- treated plants than in either bactericide-treated plants or nontreated cont rols except for the early vigor rating in 1998, Use of bacteriophages incre ased total weight of extra-large fruit 14.9 % (1997) and 24.2 % (1998) rela tive to that of nontreated control plants, and 37.8 % (1997) and 23.9 % (19 98) relative to that of plants treated with the chemical bactericides. Chem ical names used: manganese, zinc, carboxy-ethylene bis dithiocarbamate (man cozeb).