Objective: To evaluate the validity of methanol (MeOH) and formic acid (FA)
in urine as biological indicators of methyl formate (MF) exposure in exper
imental and field situations. Methods: The subjects were 28 foundrymen and
two groups of volunteers (20 control and 20 exposed). Exposure assessment o
f the workers was performed by personal air and biological monitoring. Meth
yl formate vapour collected on charcoal tube was analysed by gas chromatogr
aphy. The concentration of MF in the exposure chamber (volunteer-study) was
monitored by two independent methods [flame ionisation detection (FID) and
Fourier transformation infra-red detection (FTIR)]. Urinary metabolites (M
eOH and FA) were analysed separately by headspace gas chromatography. Resul
ts: The volunteers exposed to 100 ppm MF vapour at rest for 8 h excreted 3.
62 +/- 1.13 mg MeOH/l (mean +/- SD) at the end of the exposure. This was st
atistically different (P < 0.001) from pre-exposure MeOH excretion(2.15 +/-
0.80 mg/l), or from that of controls (1.69 +/- 0.48 mg/l). The urinary FA
excretion was 32.2 +/- 11.3 mg/g creatinine after the exposure, which was s
tatistically different (P < 0.001) from pre-exposure excretion (18.0 +/- 9.
3 mg/g creatinine) or that of controls (13.8 +/- 7.9 mg/g creatinine). In f
oundrymen, the urinary FA excretion after the 8 h workshift exposure to a t
ime weighted average (TWA) concentration of 2 to 156 ppm MF showed a dose-d
ependent increase best modelled by a polynomial function. The highest urina
ry FA concentration was 129 mg/g creatinine. The pre-shift urinary FA of th
e foundrymen (18.3 +/- 5.6 mg/g creatinine) did not differ from that of con
trols (13.8 +/- 7.9 mg/g creatinine). The urinary MeOH excretion of the fou
ndrymen after the shift, varied from <1 to 15.3 mg/l, while the correlation
with the preceding MF exposure was poor. The foundrymen excreted more (P =
0.01) FA (2.12 +/- 3.56 mg/g creatinine) after the workshift than experime
ntally, once-exposed volunteers (0.32 +/- 0.11 mg/g creatinine) at a simila
r inhaled MF level of 1 ppm). Conclusions: In spite of its high background
level in non-exposed subjects, urinary FA seems to be a useful biomarker of
methyl formate exposure. The question remains as to what is the reason for
the differences in chronic and acute exposure respectively.