Urinary methanol and formic acid as indicators of occupational exposure tomethyl formate

Citation
M. Berode et al., Urinary methanol and formic acid as indicators of occupational exposure tomethyl formate, INT A OCCUP, 73(6), 2000, pp. 410-414
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ISSN journal
03400131 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
410 - 414
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-0131(200008)73:6<410:UMAFAA>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the validity of methanol (MeOH) and formic acid (FA) in urine as biological indicators of methyl formate (MF) exposure in exper imental and field situations. Methods: The subjects were 28 foundrymen and two groups of volunteers (20 control and 20 exposed). Exposure assessment o f the workers was performed by personal air and biological monitoring. Meth yl formate vapour collected on charcoal tube was analysed by gas chromatogr aphy. The concentration of MF in the exposure chamber (volunteer-study) was monitored by two independent methods [flame ionisation detection (FID) and Fourier transformation infra-red detection (FTIR)]. Urinary metabolites (M eOH and FA) were analysed separately by headspace gas chromatography. Resul ts: The volunteers exposed to 100 ppm MF vapour at rest for 8 h excreted 3. 62 +/- 1.13 mg MeOH/l (mean +/- SD) at the end of the exposure. This was st atistically different (P < 0.001) from pre-exposure MeOH excretion(2.15 +/- 0.80 mg/l), or from that of controls (1.69 +/- 0.48 mg/l). The urinary FA excretion was 32.2 +/- 11.3 mg/g creatinine after the exposure, which was s tatistically different (P < 0.001) from pre-exposure excretion (18.0 +/- 9. 3 mg/g creatinine) or that of controls (13.8 +/- 7.9 mg/g creatinine). In f oundrymen, the urinary FA excretion after the 8 h workshift exposure to a t ime weighted average (TWA) concentration of 2 to 156 ppm MF showed a dose-d ependent increase best modelled by a polynomial function. The highest urina ry FA concentration was 129 mg/g creatinine. The pre-shift urinary FA of th e foundrymen (18.3 +/- 5.6 mg/g creatinine) did not differ from that of con trols (13.8 +/- 7.9 mg/g creatinine). The urinary MeOH excretion of the fou ndrymen after the shift, varied from <1 to 15.3 mg/l, while the correlation with the preceding MF exposure was poor. The foundrymen excreted more (P = 0.01) FA (2.12 +/- 3.56 mg/g creatinine) after the workshift than experime ntally, once-exposed volunteers (0.32 +/- 0.11 mg/g creatinine) at a simila r inhaled MF level of 1 ppm). Conclusions: In spite of its high background level in non-exposed subjects, urinary FA seems to be a useful biomarker of methyl formate exposure. The question remains as to what is the reason for the differences in chronic and acute exposure respectively.