Hpn. Scholl et J. Kremers, Large phase differences between L-cone- and M-cone-driven electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa, INV OPHTH V, 41(10), 2000, pp. 3225-3233
PURPOSE. TO Study the dynamics and interactions of the signals originating
in the long- (L-) and middle (M)-wavelength-sensitive cone pathways in pati
ents with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
METHODS. Twenty-six patients with RP and 29 normal subjects participated in
the study. Electroretinographic (ERG) responses were measured to stimuli t
hat modulated exclusively the L- or the M-cones or the two simultaneously (
both in-phase and in counter-phase) with varying ratios of L-to M-cone cont
rasts. S-cones were not modulated.
RESULTS. The data of the normal subjects and of the patients can be describ
ed by a model in which the amplitudes and the phases of the signals origina
ting in the L- and M-cones are vector summed. In the RP patients, there was
a general reduction in ERG sensitivity. The L-cone-driven ERG response was
significantly delayed, whereas the M-cone- driven ERG response was phase a
dvanced.
CONCLUSIONS. Large dynamic differences between L and M-cone-driven ERGs can
be detected in RP. As a result, the interaction between the L and M-cone s
ystems, when modulated simultaneously at 30 Hz, is subtractive in RP patien
ts and additive in normal subjects. Our data show that the use of only a st
andard white flicker ERG might lead to a misinterpretation of the mechanism
s involved in retinal disorders, because the phases of different cone-drive
n responses are not considered.