A comparison was made between a glass concentric nebulizer, a microconcentr
ic nebulizer (MCN), and a Micro Mist nebulizer for the introduction of mobi
le phases containing varying concentrations of methanol. For all nebulizers
investigated, the signal remains constant with increasing sample flow rate
at methanol concentrations greater than 20% of the mobile phase, even thou
gh the rate that sample reaches the plasma increases at increasing flow rat
es. A separation of tributlytin chloride (TBT) and triphenyltin chloride (T
PhT) on a microbore reversed-phase HPLC column using a mobile phase consist
ing of 70% methanol, 29% water, 1% glacial acetic acid and 4 mM ion pair re
agent was investigated. At a flow rate of 0.2 ml min(-1), the absolute dete
ction limits for the MCN were slightly higher than those obtained with the
Micro Mist nebulizer or the glass concentric nebulizer. Precision and the l
inearity of the calibration curves were comparable for all three nebulizers
.