Seven sequences of growth promotant implants were used in special-fed intac
t male Holstein veal calves (n = 443). Calves received implants 4 d after a
rrival at the veal barn, 42, and 84. The following implants were used: plac
ebo (0), Z (36 mg zeranol), ET (20 mg estradiol, 200 mg testosterone), EP/2
(10 mg estradiol, 100 mg progesterone), EP (20 mg estradiol, 200 mg proges
terone), and EBA (24 mg estradiol, 120 mg trenbolone acetate). The followin
g sequences were compared: 0-0-0 (negative control), 0-ET-ET, Z-ET-ET, 0-EP
-EP, Z-EP-EP, 0-EP/B-EBA, and Z-0-EBA. From 0 to 42 d, Z implants increased
(P < .05) ADG by 3.4% compared to placebo. However, implant schemes withou
t an initial Z implant (0-ET-ET and 0-EP-EP) had higher (P < .05) mean ADG
for the period from d 42 to 84. From 84 d to the end of the experiment, onl
y the 0-EP/2-EBA treatment increased (P < .05) ADG compared to 0-0-0. Over
the entire trial 0-ET-ET, 0-EP-EP, Z-EP-EP, and 0-EP/2-EBA implant sequence
s increased (P < .05) ADG by 3.2, 3.2, 2.4, and 4.7%, respectively, compare
d to the 0-0-0 sequence. Blood traits measured within 2 wk before slaughter
were not affected by implant sequence, except that sequences with EP had h
igher (P < .05) leukocyte counts than were observed for the other sequences
. Testicular weight was less (P < .01) for all of the implant sequences tha
n for the negative control and less (P < .05) for Z-ET-ET than for 0-ET-ET,
0-EP-EP, 0-EP/B-EBA, and Z-0-EBA. The type and frequency of medical treatm
ents did not differ among implant sequences for any of the 42-d phases, or
over the entire trial. Generally, the growth promotant implants currently a
pproved for beef cattle resulted in approximately 50% of the increase in gr
owth rate in Holstein intact bull calves, as has been observed in beef-type
steers or heifers.