Hy. Chen et al., The effect of excess protein on growth performance and protein metabolism of finishing barrows and gilts, J ANIM SCI, 77(12), 1999, pp. 3238-3247
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of excess protein on
growth performance, carcass characteristics, organ weights, plasma urea con
centration, and liver arginase activity of finishing barrows and gilts. In
Exp. 1, 35 barrows and 35 gilts with an initial BW of 51 kg were used. Five
pigs of each sex were slaughtered at the start of the study to determine i
nitial body composition. The remaining 60 pigs were allotted to a randomize
d complete block (RCB) experiment with a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement of tre
atments (two sexes x five protein levels: 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25% CP). The
experiment continued until the average BW was 115 kg, at which time three b
locks of pigs (30 total) were selected randomly and slaughtered. Feed intak
e decreased with increasing protein concentration (linear, P < .05), and th
e reduction was greater in gilts than in barrows (P < .05). There was a tre
nd toward a linear negative effect of dietary protein on ADG (P < .10) and
also a quadratic effect of protein on protein accretion (P < .10). Fat accr
etion decreased linearly as protein level increased (P < .05). Increased pr
otein concentrations increased liver, kidney, and pancreas weights (linear,
P < .05). Plasma urea concentration increased with each protein concentrat
ion, with the exception of the 25 vs 22% CP treatment in gilts. In Exp. 2,
18 barrows and 18 gilts (BW 63 kg) were allotted to an RCB design consistin
g of a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sexes and two die
tary protein concentrations (16 and 25% CP). The experiment was terminated
when the average BW of pigs reached 105 kg. Average daily feed intake was g
reater (P < .10) in barrows than in gilts. Average daily gain was reduced b
y 18% in gilts when dietary protein was increased from 16 to 25% but was on
ly reduced 3% in barrows (sex x protein, P < .10). Barrows had lighter live
rs (P < .005), greater arginase activities (P < .05), and greater plasma ur
ea concentrations (P < .005) than did gilts. Increasing dietary protein con
centration from 16 to 25% increased liver weight, arginase activity, and pl
asma urea concentration (P < .005). These data suggest that gilts are more
sensitive than barrows to excessive intakes of protein. The more negative e
ffects in gilts may be related to liver metabolic capacity and activity of
urea cycle enzymes.