Introduced more than 15 years ago, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has c
learly delineated indications and limitations. Although, aortic valve repla
cement is undoubtedly the treatment of choice for healthy patients with aor
tic stenosis, BAV has been demonstrated as a valuable and safe palliative p
rocedure for patients considered too risky or old for current day surgery.
Between January 1991 and December 1999, 558 patients (mean age 76 +/- 11 ye
ars, 479 [57%] women) underwent BAV at our center. Indications for BAV were
contraindication to surgery in 16.2% of the patients, high risk in 40.4%,
refusal of surgery in 10.7%, personal decision in 28.5%, and other in 14.2%
. The mean gradient decreased from 65 +/- 23 to 27 +/- 12 mmHg and the valv
e area increased from 0.56 +/- 0.19 cm(2) to 1.0 +/- 0.38 cm(2). Eleven (1.
1%) patients died during the procedure. The other severe complications were
complete AV block in 18 (1.8%) patients, stroke in 8 (0.8%), tamponade in
6 (0.6%), and massive aortic insufficiency in 4 (0.4%). In conclusion, BAV
does not replace valve replacement, even in the elderly. All those who can
be operated on, should be. However; if surgical intervention is not conside
red reasonable, BAV offers good immediate results with an acceptable compli
cation rate. Furthermore, previous published series have demonstrated that
BAV is particularly indicated in specific subgroups, such as very old patie
nts with high operative risk, end-stage heart failure, cardiogenic shock, o
r general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery.