Objective: To compare quantitatively the axial and torsional stiffness of a
retrograde intramedullary nail and a fixed angle screw side plate in treat
ing a supracondylar femur fracture in osteopenic femora. To determine the m
odes of failure of an intramedullary nail and a side plate under axial load
ing.
Design: Matched pair cadaveric study.
Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanics laboratory.
Patients and Other Participants: Eleven matched pairs of preserved human fe
mora were selected. The cadaveric specimens were harvested from relatively
elderly donors with an average age of 75.6 years, which represents the prin
cipal population at risk for poor fracture fixation.
Intervention: The eleven matched pairs were osteotomized to simulate segmen
tal structural defects in the supracondylar region. One femur of each match
ed pair was fixed with an intramedullary nail, and the contralateral femur
was fixed with a side plate.
Main Outcome Measures: Axial and torsional stiffness values. Axial modes of
failure.
Results: The intramedullary nail axial stiffness was 14 percent (p = 0.04)
less and torsional stiffness was 17 percent (p = 0.05) less than that provi
ded by the side plate. The axial failure of the intramedullary nail occurre
d distally, allowing the hardware to protrude into the articular space, The
side plate also failed distally by displacing the condylar screw into a va
rus angulation.
Conclusion: The mechanical advantages favor the use of the side plate if fi
xation stiffness is essential. The axial mode of failure occurs distally fo
r both fixation devices.