PURPOSE: To use angioscopy to evaluate and compare the amount of residual t
hrombus and endoluminal wall damage in hemodialysis grafts after percutaneo
us thrombectomy procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine thrombectomy and angioscopy procedures w
ere performed in 35 patients. Percutaneous thrombectomy methods included ei
ght different mechanical thrombectomy devices and the "lyse and wait" techn
ique, Videotaped images of 33 angioscopic examinations were independently r
eviewed by three radiologists. Two parameters-the amount of residual thromb
us and degree of endoluminal wall damage-were scored on a scale of 1 to 5,
Data were initially analyzed to validate the grading system and then furthe
r studied to compare the different thrombectomy techniques.
RESULTS: The Spearman rank order analysis validated the data pertaining to
the amount of residual thrombus (r = 0.71, P < .0001), but there was poor c
orrelation between reviewers regarding the degree of endoluminal wall damag
e. Combined scores from three reviewers revealed that the Cragg brush and P
ercutaneous Thrombectomy Device (PTD) left the smallest amounts of residual
thrombus, The other methods tested, listed by increasing amount of residua
l thrombus, were the Endovac, Hydrolyser, Amplatz Thrombectomy Device, Angi
oJet, Oasis, and the lyse and wait technique. There were two complications
related to angioscopy procedures.
CONCLUSION: Subjective observations reveal that wall-contact thrombectomy d
evices leave less residual thrombus than hydrodynamic devices, aspiration d
evices, or the lyse and wait technique.