Background Numerous factors are known to impact on patient survival after r
enal transplantation. Recent studies have confirmed a survival advantage fo
r renal transplant patients over those waiting on dialysis. We aimed to inv
estigate the hypothesis that longer waiting times are more deleterious than
shorter waiting times, that is, to detect a "dose effect" for waiting time
.
Methods. We analyzed 73,103 primary adult renal transplants registered at t
he United States Renal Data System Registry from 1988 to 1997 for the prima
ry endpoints of death with functioning graft and death-censored graft failu
re by Cox proportional hazard models. All models were corrected for donor a
nd recipient demographics and other factors known to affect outcome after k
idney transplantation.
Results. A longer waiting time on dialysis is a significant risk factor for
death-censored graft survival and patient death with functioning graft aft
er renal transplantation (P < 0.001 each). Relative to preemptive transplan
ts, waiting times of 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, a
nd over 48 months confer a 21, 28, 41, 53, and 72% increase in mortality ri
sk after transplantation, respectively. Relative to preemptive transplants,
waiting times of 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and over
24 months confer a 17, 37, 55, and 68% increase in risk for death-censored
graft loss after transplantation, respectively.
Conclusions. Longer waiting times on dialysis negatively impact on post-tra
nsplant graft and patient survival. These data strongly support the hypothe
sis that patients who reach endstage renal disease should receive a renal t
ransplant as early as possible in order to enhance their chances of long-te
rm survival.