Objective: Seek information about spinal cord safety for children with Down
syndrome positioned for ear surgery. Study Design: Prospective consecutive
patients, each serving as his or her own control. Methods: Somatosensory e
voked potentials were recorded hom 17 children who were undergoing elective
otolaryngological surgery. None of the patients had neurological symptoms
or physical examination findings suggesting cervical spinal cord embarrassm
ent, Specifically, muscle tone was normal or mildly reduced globally, consi
stent with Down syndrome, and deep tendon reflexes were normal and not appr
eciably different in the upper and lower extremities. On plain lateral radi
ographs obtained in the neutral, flexed, and extended positions, the patien
ts' cervical spines were normal. Results: When the anesthetized children ha
d their necks placed in either right or left 60 degrees rotation, no signif
icant change in somatosensory latency or amplitude was found. With more tha
n 99.999% certainty, neurologically intact children with Down syndrome with
normal plain cervical spine radiographs were not exposed to extra risks by
60 degrees neck rotation during surgery. Conclusion: Patients with Down sy
ndrome who are neurologically intact and who have normal lateral neck radio
graphs do not appear at great risk with neck rotation.