Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient

Citation
M. Lonneux et al., Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient, LARYNGOSCOP, 110(9), 2000, pp. 1493-1497
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
LARYNGOSCOPE
ISSN journal
0023852X → ACNP
Volume
110
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1493 - 1497
Database
ISI
SICI code
0023-852X(200009)110:9<1493:PETWFF>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the impact of positron emission tomography with fluor odeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in the treatment of patients suspected of having he ad and neck cancer recurrence. Study Design: Prospective and consecutive in clusion of 44 patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of head and neck tumor recurrence. Methods: FDG-PET was compared with combined com puted tomography (CT) plus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures for the differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and benign post-therape utic changes. For FDG-PET, the potential additional value of semiquantitati ve indexes was studied. The impact on patient treatment (i.e., their abilit y to accurately select patients for panendoscopic exploration) was analyzed retrospectively for both CT+MRI and PET workups. Results: The diagnostic a ccuracy was found higher for PET than for combined CT-MRI: sensitivity rang ed from 96% to 73%, specificity from 61% to 50%, and accuracy from 81% to 6 4% for PET and CT+MRI, respectively. The accuracy of FDG-PET was the highes t (94%) in patients included more than 12 weeks after the end of therapy. I n 15 discordant cases, PET was correct in 11 and CT+MRI in 4. Patient selec tion for panendoscopic exploration and biopsy was correct in 79% and 50% of patients with FDG-PET and CT+MRI, respectively, Quantification of FDG upta ke had no additional value over visual analysis alone, although we found th at a SWlbm (standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass) thresho ld of 3 could be helpful in patients scanned less than 12 weeks after the e nd of therapy. Conclusion: FDG-PET has a major additional diagnostic value to CT+MRI for the evaluation of the symptomatic patient suspected of having head and neck cancer recurrence. PET could have a direct impact on managem ent by correctly selecting patients in whom a panendoscopic exploration wit h biopsy is indicated.