P. Gillgren et al., A prospective population-based study of cutaneous malignant melanoma of the head and neck, LARYNGOSCOP, 110(9), 2000, pp. 1498-1504
Objectives/Hypothesis: For cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) of the head a
nd neck, neither prognostic factors in population-based groups, nor outcome
with respect to surgical resection margins is clear. Therefore, we analyze
d data in a regional registry to align treatment results for CMM of the hea
d and neck with prognosis and survival times. Study Design: Patient materia
l collected prospectively for an 18-year period in a Swedish cancer registr
y underwent statistical analyses to establish the most reliable prognostic
factors and the influence of surgical treatment on the survival of patients
with CMM of the head and neck. Methods: Data originated from the CMM datab
ase of the Stockholm-Gotland area of Sweden. Tumor thickness or invasivenes
s (Breslow or Clark's levels), extent of surgical margin, sex, histogenetic
type, anatomic site, and ulceration were compared statistically for 469 pa
tients. Results: Male patients with head and neck CMM had a 68% 10-year sur
vival rate; the 10-year survival rate for female patients was 87%. The corr
esponding figures for CMM at other sites were 83% and 90%, respectively. Tu
mor thickness (or Clark level of invasion) was the only statistically signi
ficant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis (P < .001). The surgica
l resection margin seemed to be of no importance to outcome. Conclusions: L
ong-term survival after treatment for CMM of the head and neck is better th
an reported in most earlier publications, presumably because our evaluation
used population-based materials, an important factor in accurate reporting
of this kind. Tumor thickness is the main prognostic factor in estimating
outcome.