Limitations of the computerized laryngeal analyzer (CLA) in the assessmentof the swallowing mechanism

Citation
R. Maestri et al., Limitations of the computerized laryngeal analyzer (CLA) in the assessmentof the swallowing mechanism, MED ENG PHY, 22(3), 2000, pp. 223-227
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
ISSN journal
13504533 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
223 - 227
Database
ISI
SICI code
1350-4533(200004)22:3<223:LOTCLA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
This study was devised to assess the repeatability of measurements obtained from the Computerized Laryngeal Analyzer (CLA), a commercial system which monitors global laryngeal activity through a piezoelectric transducer posit ioned at the level of the thyroid cartilage. Twenty-two healthy subjects (3 7+/-7 yr) were asked to repeat three consecutive times the deglutition of t hree types of bolus: dry (saliva only), liquid (10 ml water) and solid (1 c m(3) biscuit). The whole recording session was repeated 4+/-3 days apart. T wo parameters were considered: amplitude and duration of the deglutition. B oth intra- and inter-sessions repeatability were assessed by the standard e rror of measurement. The amplitude measurements were often found to be clip ped at 100 mV, making duration the only parameter suitable for analysis. Th e duration was homogenous for the three types of bolus and no trend effect was found either intra- or inter-sessions. Inter-sessions repeatability was significantly lower than the intra-session one (P<0.05). As a practical im plication, a change in duration greater than or equal to 1 s (=65% of the o bserved mean value) between two separate measurements is required in order to be 95% confident that it is not due to chance alone. We conclude that th e observed limitations in the measurements provided by the CLA system, in c onjunction with its intrinsic characteristic of providing only an uncalibra ted measurement of global laryngeal activity, seriously question the possib ility of using the CLA system either as a diagnostic tool or as a substitut e of the gold standard method (videofluorography). (C) 2000 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.