Previous studies have shown that reading rate for very large print (6 degre
es, 1.86 logMAR character size) is a strong predictor of oral reading rate
with low vision devices (LVDs). We investigated whether this would apply us
ing large print sizes more readily available in clinical situations (e.g. 2
degrees, 1.4 logMAR), for subjects with macular degeneration. We assessed
rauding rates-reading for understanding. A combination of near word visual
acuity and large print reading rate (without LVDs) provided the best predic
tion of oral rauding rates (with LVDs. However, near word visual acuity alo
ne was almost as good. Similarly, silent rauding rate was predicted best by
near word visual acuity alone. We give near visual acuity limits as a clin
ical guide to expected oral and silent reading performance with LVDs for pa
tients with macular degeneration. (C) 2000 The College of Optometrists. Pub
lished by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.