Search for problem areas in endometrial biopsies to achieve quality assurance

The aim of this study was to underline the frequently seen problems in diag nosing the lesions seen in the hyperplasia-carcinoma sequence by evaluating the variances between the observers. Four pathologists re-evaluated 137 en dometrial biopsies and grouped them into diagnostic categories. The results were analyzed by Kappa statistics. Full agreement was reached in 89 cases (64.96%), with Kappa values ranging between 0.63-0.74. Three observers rend ered the same diagnosis in 34 (24.81%) cases, and only one pathologist disa greed. Two or more observers held different views in 16 cases (10.95%). The problem areas were as follows: criteria distinguishing simple hyperplasia from other benign lesions, discrimination between atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma, and decision-making regarding the presence of atypia. There was a tendency towards overdiagnosis of hyperplasia in our department. Since th e progression to carcinoma is a sequential event, borderline cases will exi st if categories based on simple and clear cut off points are not defined.