Arrays with horizontal or vertical texture boundaries formed by element ori
entation and length cues were displayed, and the texture boundary formed by
one cue was specified as the target. The boundaries formed by the two cues
were coincident on some trials and orthogonal on others. Observers' accura
cy in reporting the orientation of the target boundary was improved by a co
incident nontarget boundary and was worsened by an orthogonal one. Conditio
nal mutual information measures are used to show how effects due to context
ual modulation can be distinguished from effects due to additive combinatio
n of the cues. The results of five experiments are interpreted as evidence
that the transmission of information about specific texture boundary cues i
s modulated by task context but not by a coincident or orthogonal boundary
in another cue. We therefore distinguish between the effects of "context,"
as shown by the effects of any variable not called the target, and "modulat
ory contextual effects," as shown by the effects of one variable on the tra
nsmission of information specifically about another.