Kj. Bennett et al., Cost-utility analysis in depression: The McSad utility measure for depression health states, PSYCH SERV, 51(9), 2000, pp. 1171-1176
Cost-utility analysis, used increasingly over the past decade to analyze co
sts and effects in treating physical diseases, has received little attentio
n in psychiatry. This article briefly introduces the concepts and methods o
f utility measurement and illustrates it using depression as an example. Th
e authors describe the McSad health state classification system for depress
ion, a direct utility measure for depression, and report results of an appl
ication of McSad among 105 patients who had a recent history of depression.
Utility measures express patient preferences for specific health states on
a scale ranging from 0, representing death, to 1, representing perfect hea
lth. These scores provide the weights used to calculate the number of quali
ty-adjusted Life-years gained by an intervention or set-vice. McSad allows
a patient's depression health state to be classified according to level of
functioning in six dimensions of depression and to be compared with other h
ypothetical depression health states in order to produce utility scores ind
icating the patient's relative preferences.