Background. In multiple myeloma 5 different infiltration patterns can be di
fferentiated: 1. normal appearance of bone marrow, 2. focal involvement, 3.
homogeneous diffuse infiltration, 4. combined diffuse and focal infiltrati
on, 5."salt- and pepper" pattern with inhomogeneous bone marrow with interp
osition of fat islands.
Methods. For the fast and total acquisition of all patterns a combination o
f a T1-weighted spin echo sequence and a fat suppression technique is super
ior. The focal involvement is clearly demonstrated as areas of high signal
intensity on e.g. STIR images. Diffuse involvement can be quantified object
ively by calculation of the percentage of signal intensity increase after c
ontrast material injection. MRI is superior to X-ray in focal and diffuse i
nvolvement. With ultrafast sequences a "screening" of the whole red bone ma
rrow as for myeloma infiltration is possible.
Prognosis. In prognosis studies diffuse infiltration is inferior to focal i
nvolvement. Patients without bone marrow infiltration have a significantly
longer survival than patients with bone marrow infiltration in MRI at the t
ime of diagnosis. However, even patients in stage one of disease (Durie and
Salmon) a nd negative X-ray films can show bone marrow infiltration in MRI
. Those patients often show an early disease progression. Good response to
therapy in focal involvement are: reduction of signal intensity on T2- weig
hted spin echo images, lack or rim-like enhancement after contrast material
injection or even a normalisation of bone marrow signal. In case of diffus
e involvement a partly patchy reconversion to fatty marrow can be seen.