Ta. Peterman et al., Does measured behavior reflect STD risk? An analysis of data from a randomized controlled behavioral intervention study, SEX TRA DIS, 27(8), 2000, pp. 446-451
Background: Many studies measure sex behavior to determine the efficacy of
sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV prevention interventions.
Goal: To determine how well measured behavior reflects STD incidence.
Study Design: Data from a trial (Project RESPECT) were analyzed to compare
behavior and incidence of STD (gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, HIV) during
two 6-month intervals.
Results: A total of 2879 persons had 5062 six-monthly STD exams and intervi
ews; 8.9% had a new STD in 6 months. Incidence was associated with demograp
hic factors but only slightly associated with number of partners and number
of unprotected sex acts with occasional partners. Many behaviors had parad
oxical associations with STD incidence. After combining behavior variables
to compare persons with highest and lowest risk behaviors, the STD incidenc
e ratio was only 1.7.
Conclusion: Behavioral interventions have prevented STD. We found people te
nd to have safe sex with risky partners and risky sex with safe partners. T
herefore, it is difficult to extrapolate the disease prevention efficacy of
an intervention from a measured effect on behavior alone.