Does measured behavior reflect STD risk? An analysis of data from a randomized controlled behavioral intervention study

Citation
Ta. Peterman et al., Does measured behavior reflect STD risk? An analysis of data from a randomized controlled behavioral intervention study, SEX TRA DIS, 27(8), 2000, pp. 446-451
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease","da verificare
Journal title
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
ISSN journal
01485717 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
446 - 451
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-5717(200009)27:8<446:DMBRSR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Background: Many studies measure sex behavior to determine the efficacy of sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV prevention interventions. Goal: To determine how well measured behavior reflects STD incidence. Study Design: Data from a trial (Project RESPECT) were analyzed to compare behavior and incidence of STD (gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, HIV) during two 6-month intervals. Results: A total of 2879 persons had 5062 six-monthly STD exams and intervi ews; 8.9% had a new STD in 6 months. Incidence was associated with demograp hic factors but only slightly associated with number of partners and number of unprotected sex acts with occasional partners. Many behaviors had parad oxical associations with STD incidence. After combining behavior variables to compare persons with highest and lowest risk behaviors, the STD incidenc e ratio was only 1.7. Conclusion: Behavioral interventions have prevented STD. We found people te nd to have safe sex with risky partners and risky sex with safe partners. T herefore, it is difficult to extrapolate the disease prevention efficacy of an intervention from a measured effect on behavior alone.