Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London

Citation
T. Pierpoint et al., Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London, SEX TRANS I, 76(4), 2000, pp. 273-276
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease","da verificare
Journal title
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
ISSN journal
13684973 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
273 - 276
Database
ISI
SICI code
1368-4973(200008)76:4<273:POCTIY>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common, treatable, bacterial sexually transmitted infection in England and Wales. Among men, chlamydial infection is an important cause of non-gonococcal urethritis, epididymitis, and proctitis. The case for wider screening among women has been accepted by an expert advisory group. In the absence of estimates of the prevalence of infection in men, its potential impact at the population level is diffic ult to assess. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in clinic and community based samples in north west London. Method: Cross sectional survey in healthcare centres and general practices in north west London. 1002 males aged 18-35 years, living in north west Lon don, were recruited by staff in occupational health departments, general pr actices, student health services, and a "well man" clinic and by postal rec ruitment in four GP practices. The men were tested for C trachomatis using the ligase chain reaction assay on urine samples. The main outcome measure was prevalence of C trachomatis infection in men aged 18-35 years. Results: The overall response rate was 51%. Prevalence of confirmed infecti on was 1.9% (95% CI: 1.14% to 2.96%) in all men. Best estimated minimum pre valence of infection was 1% (95% CI: 0.58% to 1.50%). Estimated prevalence was highest among men aged over 30 years. Conclusions: The estimated prevalence among men is commensurate with chat d escribed for female populations in London. The results suggest that recruit ment of men to screening programmes would be difficult. However, a higher p roportion of chlamydial infection may be detected in men than in women by e xisting approaches to control through genitourinary medicine clinic based c ase finding and contact tracing. Screening of young women and the contact t racing of the male partners of positive females may be an efficient approac h to improving chlamydia control.