Em. Targarona et M. Trias, Laparoscopic splenectomy: Comparison of anterior/posterior approach, 7TH WORLD CONGRESS OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2000, pp. 545-552
The spleen can be approached by laparoscopy through diverse patient positio
ns. The most difficult step of LS is the careful liberation of the posterio
r face of the spleen from the posterior attachments. Is for that question t
hat the transition and evolution of LS has been associated to the increased
lateral tilt of the patient till the full lateral approach. With this modi
fication, a great advantage is gained from gravity and the weight of the sp
leen facilitates the dissection Aim: To summarise the different alternative
s for LS. Results: The techniques proposed for LS are 1.- Anterior (supine)
in supine or modified lithotomy position, 2.- Lateral (Semilateral (45-60%
) or Full lateral(90 degrees). In this option, the splenic hilum is dissect
ed by an antero lateral, postero lateral or with the 'hanged spleen' techni
que. Finally, 'hand assisted' LS (HALS) is a new alternative for selected c
ases. Conclusion: The evolution in patient position has expanded the succes
s of LS. LS are the preferred treatment for cases with small spleens. Splen
omegaly increases the difficulty for LS, but alternative strategies (HLAS)
permit to offer the laparoscopic surgery to this specific subset of patient
s.