Understanding the relationship between formal and informal support is becom
ing increasingly important for those involved in caring for the elderly (Ba
ss et al., 1996; McAuley et al., 1990). As the elderly become more dependen
t on formal services and changes in demographics result in more women in th
e workforce and fewer available informal caregivers, there is a need for or
ganized and efficient formal support networks that work well with, rather t
han replace, family helpers (Aneshensel et al., 1995; Scott & Roberto, 1985
). Several models of the interface of formal-informal support have been pro
posed in the literature (e.g. Cantor, 1975; Edelman, 1986; Greene, 1983; Li
twak, 1985). A sample of 305 primary family caregivers were interviewed at
three points in time regarding their use of formal services and assistance
from additional family members. It was possible to classify the sample init
ially into three types of family/formal interface: isolates who receive no
help from family or formal services, family dependent who are assisted by k
in but not formal services, and formal who receive some assistance from pai
d services. These groups were examined over time for stability of group mem
bership and nursing home placement. Characteristics of caregivers and their
relatives who fell in each category were also examined. There were differe
nces in caregiver stress and rates of subsequent placement rates for people
in the three initial categories of informal/formal interface (isolates, fa
mily dependent, formal), but moving from one category to another during the
course of the study was more strongly associated both with care-related st
ress and placing the person with dementia into an institution than was stab
le membership in the other categories.