Identifying a control group when cases come from a specialized hospital is
a challenge for epidemiologists. The authors compared controls recruited by
using a commercial database with those recruited by random digit dialing i
n the context of a hospital-based case-control study of ovarian cancer. Thi
s part of the study was conducted in 1997-1998 among women aged 18 years or
older who resided in the New York metropolitan area. A mailing list owner
grouped cases into "lifestyle" clusters based on US zip+4 postal code micro
neighborhoods and generated a random sample of potential controls with the
same distribution across the clusters. Controls recruited from the commerci
al database (n = 82) and from random digit dialing (n = 90) were similar in
age and race. Women from the commercial database had somewhat more educati
on and higher incomes and were more similar to the cases on these measures.
The control groups resembled each other closely in terms of oral contracep
tive use, nulliparity, and religion and differed from the cases on these me
asures. Response rates were similar for the two groups. Only 28% of the cas
es were included on the mailing list, indicating that it did not reflect th
e source population of the cases. Use of a commercial database provided a c
ontrol group whose socioeconomic factors were similar to those of cases at
a lower cost than when random digit dialing was used but did not result in
a higher response rate.