Ma. Anderson et al., Endoscopic ultrasound is highly accurate and directs management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas, AM J GASTRO, 95(9), 2000, pp. 2271-2277
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors wi
th traditional imaging fails in 40-60% of patients. Endoscopic ultrasound (
EUS) is highly sensitive in the detection of these tumors. Previous reports
included relatively few patients or required the collaboration of multiple
centers. We report the results of EUS evaluation of 82 patients with pancr
eatic neuroendocrine tumors.
METHODS: We prospectively used EUS early in the diagnostic evaluation of pa
tients with biochemical or clinical evidence of neuroendocrine tumors. Pati
ents had surgical confirmation of tumor localization or clinical follow-up
of >1 yr.
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent 91 examinations (cases). Thirty pati
ents had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type I. One hundred pancreat
ic tumors were visualized by EUS in 54 different patients. The remaining 28
patients had no pancreatic tumor or an extrapancreatic tumor. Surgical/pat
hological confirmation was obtained in 75 patients. The mean tumor diameter
was 1.51 cm and 71% of the tumors were less than or equal to 2.0 cm in dia
meter. Of the 54 explorations with surgical confirmation of a pancreatic tu
mor, EUS correctly localized the tumor in 50 patients (93%). Twenty-nine in
sulinomas, 18 gastrinomas, as well as one glucagonoma, one carcinoid tumor,
and one somatostatinoma were localized. The most common site for tumor loc
alization was the pancreatic head (46 patients). Most tumors were hypoechoi
c, homogenous, and had distinct margins. EUS of the pancreas was correctly
negative in 20 of 21 patients (specificity, 95%). EUS was more accurate tha
n angiography with or without stimulation testing (secretin for gastrinoma,
calcium for insulinoma), transcutaneous ultrasound, and CT in those patien
ts undergoing further imaging procedures. EUS was not reliable in localizin
g extrapancreatic tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the largest single center experience reported
to date, EUS had an overall sensitivity and accuracy of 93% for pancreatic
neuroendocrine tumors. Our results support the use of EUS as a primary diag
nostic modality in the evaluation and management of patients with neuroendo
crine tumors of the pancreas. (Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2271-2277. (C) 20
00 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology).