Clinical experience of psychotherapists is getting more and more circumscri
bed by the boundaries of theoretical references. The Freudian "psychic trea
tment" for neurosis got its impetus from the friendship between Sigmund Fre
ud and Ludwig Binswanger, the phenomenological psychiatrist. This relations
hip laid the foundation for the references of psychoanalytic psychotherapy
in Europe. Then, the Freudian conception of actual neurosis led to a psycho
somatic approach. Later the study of narcissistic neurosis opened up to bor
derline patients. Teddy, scientific and medical progress greatly influence
psychopathological research and the way we look at our patients and their r
equests. These changes come from the patients' sayings and their expectancy
of well-being. At the same time psychotherapists have to take a new look a
t their theoretical references. On the one hand, a dynamic concept for psyc
hotherapy is necessary for integrating the phenomenologic approach into psy
choanalysis, and providing the understanding of situations emerging in neur
ological dysfunction. On the other hand, psychotherapists pay more attentio
n to the different actors contributing to a pathology (Who is suffering? Wh
at about the life-partner or the relatives?). These changes lead to a new l
ook into the processes of identification as well as the notion of identity.
This article discusses these influences on psychotherapy and clinical rese
arch showing how clinical situations get ahead of theoretical references.