An analytical, numerical, and experimental comparison of the fluid velocity in the vicinity of an open tank with one and two lateral exhaust slot hoods and a uniform crossdraft
Lm. Conroy et al., An analytical, numerical, and experimental comparison of the fluid velocity in the vicinity of an open tank with one and two lateral exhaust slot hoods and a uniform crossdraft, ANN OCCUP H, 44(6), 2000, pp. 407-419
The objective of this research was to compare mathematical models of the fl
uid velocity in the vicinity of an open tank with lateral slot exhaust, Two
approaches were explored: a numerical solution assuming turbulent flow and
an analytical solution assuming potential flow. A numerical simulation of
the how field in and around an open surface tank was performed using the co
mmercial software FLUENT(R). An analytical solution was obtained using two-
dimensional potential fluid how determined using the Schwarz-Christoffel tr
ansformation and complex potential theory. The numerical and analytical sol
utions were compared with numerical solutions and experimental measurements
published by others. The numerical solution using FLUENT and the two numer
ical solutions published by others appear to reflect experimental condition
s with equal accuracy, In some regions, the FLUENT solution appears better
while in other regions the other tno solutions appear better. Differences i
n geometry and boundary conditions could explain these differences. Greater
differences were observed between the FLUENT and CFX-F3D(TM) solutions tha
n between the EOL-2D(TM) and CFX-F3D solutions. This was unexpected since t
he geometry, boundary conditions, and turbulence model were more similar in
the former case than in the latter. The potential flow solution, while sim
pler and less computationally intensive than the numerical solutions, resul
ted in estimates of experimental velocity that were equally as good as thos
e of the numerical solutions, The simplicity and conservative estimates of
this model make it useful for estimating exhaust hood flea fields. (C) 2000
British Occupational Hygiene Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. A
ll rights reserved.