P. Stone et al., Cancer-related fatigue: Inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey, ANN ONCOL, 11(8), 2000, pp. 971-975
Objectives: To investigate cancer patients' experience of fatigue and their
perceptions about the causes, management and impact of this symptom.
Design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey.
Settings: Three regional cancer centres; Glasgow, Birmingham and Southampto
n.
Participants: One thousand three hundred seven outpatients with cancer atte
nding the three units over a 30-day period.
Main outcome measures: Investigator designed questionnaire and the fatigue
sub-scale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fatigue (FACT-F)
questionnaire.
Results: The response rate was 576 of 1307 (44%). Fatigue was reported to a
ffect 58% of patients 'somewhat or very much'. The comparable figures for p
ain and nausea/vomiting were 22% and 18%, respectively. Fatigue had never b
een reported to the hospital doctor by 52% (281 of 538) of patients with th
is symptom. Only 75 patients (14%) had received treatment or advice about t
he management of their fatigue. Fatigue was reported to be not well-managed
by 33% (180 of 538) of patients with this symptom. The comparable figures
for pain and nausea/vomiting were 9% (46 of 538) and 7% (37 of 538), respec
tively. The median FACT-F score was 18 (range 0-52). On multivariate analys
is 54% of the variation in FACT-F scores could be explained by the combinat
ion of quality of life, depression, dyspnoea, weight loss/anorexia and use
of analgesics in the previous month.
Conclusions: Fatigue has been identified as an important problem by patient
s with cancer. It affects more patients for more of the time than any other
symptom and is regarded by patients as being more important than either pa
in or nausea/vomiting. Research into the aetiology and management of this s
ymptom should be regarded as a priority.