Eg. Daoud et al., Initial clinical experience with ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator for conversion of atrial fibrillation, CIRCULATION, 102(12), 2000, pp. 1407-1413
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-A recent study has shown that the implantable atrial defibrillat
or can restore sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation
when therapy was delivered under physician observation. The objective of th
is study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambulatory use of the i
mplantable atrial defibrillator,
Methods and Results-An atrial defibrillator was implanted in 105 patients (
75 men; mean age, 59+/-12 years) with recurrent, symptomatic, drug-refracto
ry atrial fibrillation, After successful 3-month testing, patients could tr
ansition to ambulatory delivery of shock therapy. Patients completed questi
onnaires regarding shock therapy discomfort and therapy satisfaction using
a 10-point visual-analog scale (1 represented "not at all," 10 represented
"extremely") after each treated episode of atrial fibrillation, During a me
an follow-up of 11.7 months, 48 of 105 patients satisfied criteria for tran
sition and received therapy for 275 episodes of atrial fibrillation, Overal
l shock therapy efficacy was 90% with 1.6+/-1.2 shocks delivered per episod
e (median, 1). Patients rated shock discomfort as 5.2+/-2.4 for successful
therapy and 4.2+/-2.2 for unsuccessful therapy (P>0.05), The satisfaction s
core was higher for successful versus unsuccessful therapy (3.4+/-3.3 versu
s 8.7+/-1.3, P<0.05). There was no ventricular proarrhythmia observed throu
ghout the course of this study.
Conclusions-Ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator can safel
y and successfully convert most episodes of atrial fibrillation, often requ
iring only a single shock. Successful therapy is associated with high satis
faction and only moderate discomfort.