The adoption of physical thresholds as a ceiling for permitted climate chan
ge sidesteps contentious issues such as: policy cost, impact valuation, dis
counting and equity. In this paper I offer some reflections on the concept
of tolerable climate change. I also use an integrated climate assessment mo
del (ICAM-3) to demonstrate how uncertainties in our understanding of socio
economic and earth systems reduce the probability of success in keeping cli
mate change within a pre-defined tolerable range. Finally, I explore the im
plications of socioeconomic thresholds for welfare loss in pursuit of a cli
mate policy (e.g., tax rebellions). Crossing such regional socioeconomic th
resholds will lead to local failures to pursue climate change mitigation po
licies - increasing the probability of straying beyond the tolerable window
of global climate change. Given various uncertainties and the dynamics of
the socioeconomic and the earth systems, the odds of success in staying wit
hin a climate change window of Delta T less than or equal to 2 degrees C, a
nd Delta T/yr less than or equal to 0.015 degrees C are estimated to be no
higher than 25% over the next century. A risk-risk tradeoff approach appear
s to hold promise, but while adoption of a larger window of tolerance incre
ases the probability of success, it also opens the window specification cri
teria to contention.