Evaluation of two new urinary tumor markers: Bladder tumor fibronectin andcytokeratin 18 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer

Citation
M. Sanchez-carbayo et al., Evaluation of two new urinary tumor markers: Bladder tumor fibronectin andcytokeratin 18 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer, CLIN CANC R, 6(9), 2000, pp. 3585-3594
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
10780432 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3585 - 3594
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-0432(200009)6:9<3585:EOTNUT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Our objectives were to evaluate the diagnostic value of two new urinary tum or markers, cytokeratin 18 (CK18) and bladder tumor fibronectin (BTF), for the detection and monitoring of bladder cancer. The study comprised 931 uri ne samples belonging to 402 subjects: 112 individuals under suspicion for a primary bladder tumor (group 1); 104 bladder cancer patients under schedul ed follow-up (group 2); 109 bladder cancer patients receiving intravesical instillations (group 3); 45 patients with other urological diseases (group 4); and 32 healthy subjects (group 5), Voided urine samples were collected before cystoscopies, between them and before intravesical instillations, CK 18 and BTF tests were measured by chemiluminescent immunoassays, Optimal re ceiver operating characteristic cutoffs of 7.4 mu g/L for CK18 and 52.8 mu g/liter for BTF rendered overall sensitivities of 66.2% for CK18 and 80.0% for BTF at specificities of 88.4 and 74.7%, respectively. Urinary cytology provided a sensitivity of 29.2% at a specificity of 99.1%, Sensitivities we re 80.8, 74.2, and 82.3% for BTF and 71.1, 77.4, and 64.7% for CK18 for gro ups 1 to 3, respectively, False positive rates were higher for BTF in all g roups of patients. Elevated urinary tumor markers during the monitoring of patients with bladder cancer could detect recurrence sooner than scheduled cystoscopies, Persistence of negative markers was greatly indicative of fre e of disease status in follow-up, CK18 and BTF in urine may eventually prov e to be of benefit for specific patients with bladder carcinoma given its h igher sensitivity compared with cytology, In selected patients, namely thos e with persistent negative urinary CK18 and BTF, the number of cystoscopies could be reduced.