Aims: The tumour marker CA19-9 hat; been promoted as a reliable test for th
e detection of pancreatobiliary malignancy, yet its diagnostic role remains
poorly defined. In this study the clinical interpretation of a raised seru
m CA19-9 level has been evaluated, with particular reference to obstructive
jaundice.
Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients with a CA19-9 level above 33 U
/ml were studied. Serum CA19-9 was compared with clinical diagnosis and cor
related with serum bilirubin level. In a subgroup of jaundiced patients (16
benign and 15 malignant cases): follow-up CA19-9 levels were determined 2
weeks after biliary drainage.
Results: The median CA19-9 level was lower in benign cases (102 (IQR 50-264
) U/ml) than those with pancreatobiliary tumours (910 (IQR 263-6170) U/ml;
P<0.01), although the overlap was substantial. In benign jaundiced cases, a
positive correlation was observed between bilirubin and CA19-9 elevation (
R = 0.41, P<0.01). Relief of jaundice was associated with a fall in CA19-9
level in all benign cases and in nine of the 15 with malignancy.
Conclusion: Confident discrimination between benign and malignant disease c
ould not be made on the basis of a solitary elevated CA19-9 measurement. Hy
perbilirubinaemia was associated with a further deterioration in specificit
y and caution is warranted when interpreting the results in jaundiced patie
nts. Overall, only one half of patients with an elevated CA19-9 level ultim
ately proved to harbour a malignancy. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.