Heterochrony, evolutionary changes in rate or timing of development produci
ng parallelism between ontogeny and phylogeny, is viewed as the most common
type of evolutionary change in development. Alternative hypotheses such as
heterotopy, evolutionary change in the spatial patterning of development,
are rarely entertained. We examine the evidence for heterochrony and hetero
topy in the evolution of body shape in two clades of piranhas. One of these
is the sole case of heterochrony previously reported in the group; the oth
ers were previously interpreted as cases of heterotopy. To compare ontogeni
es of shape, we computed ontogenetic trajectories of shape by multivariate
regression of geometric shape variables (i.e., partial warp scores and shap
e coordinates) on centroid size. Rates of development relative to developme
ntal age and angles between the trajectories were compared statistically. W
e found a significant difference in developmental rate between species of S
errasalmus, suggesting that heterochrony is a partial explanation for the e
volution of body shape, but we also found a significant difference between
their ontogenetic transformations; the direction of the difference between
them suggests that heterotopy also plays a role in this group. In Pygocentr
us we found no difference in developmental rate among species, but we did f
ind a difference in the ontogenies, suggesting that heterotopy, but not het
erochrony, is the developmental basis for shape diversification in this gro
up. The prevalence of heterotopy as a source of evolutionary novelty remain
s largely unexplored and will not become clear until the search for develop
mental explanations looks beyond heterochrony.