Poor outcome with round spermatid injection in azoospermic patients with maturation arrest

Citation
D. Levran et al., Poor outcome with round spermatid injection in azoospermic patients with maturation arrest, FERT STERIL, 74(3), 2000, pp. 443-449
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
74
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
443 - 449
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200009)74:3<443:POWRSI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI ) and round spermatid injection (ROSI), both obtained by testicular sperm e xtraction (TESE), and to compare the results of fresh versus frozen ROSI. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: An IVF unit at a university hospital Patient(s): Eighteen infertile couples with nonobstructive azoospermia. Intervention(s): TESE with ROSI or ICSI of mature spermatozoa into metaphas e II oocytes was performed. The resulting embryos were transferred to femal e partners. The spare round spermatids were frozen. Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization and cleavage rates, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy rates. Result(s): Seventeen ROSI cycles and six ICSI cycles were compared. Fertili zation rate following ROSI (44.9%) was significantly lower than with ICSI ( 69%). A significantly higher rate of cleavage arrest occurred following ROS I (40.8%) as compared to ICSI (8.2%). The morphology of embryos resulting f rom ROSI was significantly pool-rr. No pregnancies were achieved following ROSI as compared to a 50% clinical pregnancy rate in the ICSI group. The fe rtilization and cleavage rates following ROSI with fresh versus frozen-thaw ed spermatids were comparable. Conclusion(s): In azoospermic patients with maturation arrest at the stage of round spermatids the efficiency of ROSI appears to be extremely poor. Th e role of ROSI in the treatment of nonobstructive azoospermia should be ree valuated. (Fertil Steril(R) 2000;74:443-9. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).