The current payment system for Medicare+Choice (M+C) plans is based on pric
es calculated from administrative records. This system has been criticized
as arbitrary, inefficient, and unfair. Most Medicare reform proposals would
replace the current payment system with some form of competitive pricing.
However, efforts over the past five years to demonstrate competitive pricin
g for M+C plans have been blocked repeatedly by Congress, even when the dem
onstrations were directly responsive to a congressional mandate. In the abs
ence of political support, a demonstration of competitive pricing may be in
feasible, and Congress could be forced to take the risky step of implementi
ng broad Medicare reforms with very little information about their effects.