The cost-effectiveness of radon-induced lung cancer prevention in schools

Citation
Ca. Kennedy et Am. Gray, The cost-effectiveness of radon-induced lung cancer prevention in schools, INT J ENV H, 10(3), 2000, pp. 181-190
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09603123 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
181 - 190
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-3123(200009)10:3<181:TCORLC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
An economic evaluation of a radon-induced lung cancer prevention programme for schools in the United Kingdom is undertaken in this study, which presen ts a cost-effectiveness analysis with a generalisable model for estimating the cost-effectiveness of a radon remediation programme for schools from a societal perspective. It follows the guidelines for the methodological fram ework now considered appropriate in the economic evaluation of health inter ventions and employs best available national UK data and information from N orthamptonshire on the costs and effectiveness of radon identification and remediation in schools, and the costs and health impact of lung cancer case s for all state schools in Northamptonshire between 1993 and 1997 (348 scho ols, including 170 adult staff and 1820 pupils). The resultant cost-effecti veness ratio was pound 7550 per life-year gained in 1997 UK pound sterling. Results from the sensitivity analysis show that the ratio is particularly sensitive to assumptions concerning two parameters: the average capital cos t of remediation and discount rate applied to life years. This study highli ghts the need for the evaluation of other schools remediation-based radon-i nduced lung cancer prevention programmes in other countries using similar m ethodological techniques. Compared to other health interventions in the UK, the schools programme has a favourable ratio. When compared to other lung cancer prevention programmes available, however, the schools programme rati o is less favourable. Uncertainties remain around increased risks from chil dhood exposure to indoor radon.