Selective digestive decontamination in patients in intensive care

Citation
Mjm. Bonten et al., Selective digestive decontamination in patients in intensive care, J ANTIMICRO, 46(3), 2000, pp. 351-362
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,Microbiology
Journal title
Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN journal
03057453 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
351 - 362
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) is the most extensively studied m ethod for the prevention of infection in patients in intensive care units ( ICUs). Despite 27 prospective randomized studies and six meta-analyses, rou tine use of SDD is still controversial. In this review, we summarize the av ailable scientific information on effectiveness of SDD in ICU patients. The effects of SDD have been studied in different combinations of the concept, using different antibiotics. Comparison of the individual studies, therefo re, is difficult. In most studies, SDD resulted in significant reductions i n the number of diagnoses of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, inci dences of ventilator-associated pneumonia in control groups ranged from 5% to 85%. Moreover, these reductions in incidences of ventilator-associated p neumonia in individual studies were not associated with improved patient su rvival, reductions of duration of ventilation or ICU stay, or reductions in antibiotic use. The numbers of patients studied are too small to determine effects on patient survival. Although two meta-analyses suggested a 20% mo rtality reduction when using the full concept of SDD (topical and systemic prophylaxis) these results should be interpreted with caution. Formal cost- benefit analyses of SDD have not been performed. SDD is associated with the selection of microorganisms that are intrinsically resistant to the antibi otics used. However, the studies are too small and too short to investigate whether SDD will lead to development of antibiotic resistance. As long as the benefits of SDD (better patient survival, reduction in antibiotic use o r improved cost-effectiveness) have not been firmly established, the routin e use of SDD for mechanically ventilated patients is not advised.