Evaluation of two commercially available immunoassays for the detection ofhantavirus antibodies in serum samples

Citation
P. Koraka et al., Evaluation of two commercially available immunoassays for the detection ofhantavirus antibodies in serum samples, J CLIN VIRO, 17(3), 2000, pp. 189-196
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
13866532 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
189 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
1386-6532(20000901)17:3<189:EOTCAI>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background: hantaviruses are members of the family Bunyaviridae and the spe ctrum of clinical symptoms in humans may vary from sub-clinical to severe h aemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) or pulmonary syndrome (HPS). S everal serotypes have been described from which at least five are pathogeni c to humans. Each serotype has a different animal reservoir and geographica l distribution. In the acute phase of the disease the clinical diagnosis ma y be confirmed by serology or by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR). Objective : to evaluate two commercially available immunoassays using sera from hanta virus suspected and non-hantavirus patients: an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) de veloped by MRL Diagnostics, for the detection of immunoglobulins M (IgM) an d G (Igc) against several hantavirus serotypes and an indirect immunofluore scence assay (IFA) from Progen, based on slides coated with Hantaan virus ( HNTV) and Puumala virus (PUUV), infected cells. Study design: a total of 14 5 serum samples were used for this study. The serum panel included serum sa mples from patients suspected of mild (n = 91), severe (n = 10) HFRS and pa tients with other viral infections (n = 44). Results: the agreement between the MRL EIA and the Progen IFA for the detection of IgM and Ige serum anti bodies ranged from 87 to 91%, respectively. In the non-hantavirus group one out of 44 samples was positive by the Progen HNTV IgM IFA, none in the:Pro gen PUUV IFA and two samples in the MRL IgM EIA, resulting in specificities of 98, 100 and 95%, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities of t he MRL EIAs compared to the Progen overall PUUV and HNTV IFAs were 90 and 9 1% for IgM, respectively, and 96% for IgG in both immunoassays. Conclusions . the MRL EIA proved to be relatively sensitive and specific assay for the serological diagnosis of mild and severe HFRS. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevi er Science B.V.