Five experiments were conducted to explore how the character of the retenti
on interval affected event-based prospective memory. According to the canon
s of retrospective memory, prospective performance should have been worse w
ith increasing delays between intention formation and the time it was appro
priate to complete an action. That result did not occur. Rather, prospectiv
e memory was better with increasing retention intervals in Experiments 1A,
1B, and 3. In manipulating the nature of the retention interval, the author
s found that there were independent contributions of retention interval len
gth and the number of intervening activities, with more activities leading
to better prospective memory (Experiments 2 and 3). The identical retention
intervals did not improve retrospective memory in Experiment 4. Theoretica
l explanations for these dissociations between prospective and retrospectiv
e memory are considered.