Ab initio computational studies of conformationally restricted Cope rearrangements. First examples of fully concerted allenyl cope rearrangements

Citation
Ja. Duncan et Mc. Spong, Ab initio computational studies of conformationally restricted Cope rearrangements. First examples of fully concerted allenyl cope rearrangements, J ORG CHEM, 65(18), 2000, pp. 5720-5727
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis","Organic Chemistry/Polymer Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00223263 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
18
Year of publication
2000
Pages
5720 - 5727
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3263(20000908)65:18<5720:AICSOC>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Results of (8,8)CASPT2/6-31G*//(8,8)CASSCF/6-31G* level. calculations on th e potential surface for the conformationally restricted allenyl Cope rearra ngements of syn-5-propadienylbicylco[2.1.0]pent-2-ene (14) and syn-6-propad ienylbicyclo[2.1.1]hex-2-ene (15) are reported. Both are found to proceed t hrough concerted pathways. Also included are the results of (6,6)CASPT2/6-3 1G*//(6,6)CASSCF/6-31G* level calculations on the Cope rearrangements of sy n-5-ethenylbicyclo[2.1.0]pent-2-ene (18), syn-6-ethenylbicyclo[2.1.1]hex-2- ene (19), and syn-7-vinylnorborene (20), which are found to involve diallyl ic diradical intermediates 26, 30, and 36, respectively. Previous studies h ave shown that the allenyl Cope rearrangement of 1,2,6-heptatriene (1) to 3 -methylene-1,5-hexadiene (2) involves a single transition structure that ei ther proceeds to the monoallylic cyclohexane-1,4-diyl derivative 3 or bypas ses 3 to form 2 directly.(4) More recently, the conformationally restricted allenyl Cope rearrangement of syn-7-allenylnorbornene (7) has also been fo und to involve tricyclic monoallylic cyclohexane-1,4-diyl intermediate 11.( 7) The rearrangements of 14 and 15 appear to represent the first reported e xamples of fully concerted allenyl Cope rearrangements. Concertedness in th ese cases is ascribed to two parallel factors: (I) the relative instability of possible tricyclic diradical intermediates 16 and 17, compared to dirad ical intermediates 3 and 11 formed in the rearrangements of I and 7, respec tively; and (2) the opportunity that exists to form sp-sp(2) sigma bonds in transition structures 21 and 23 that lead, respectively, to products 22 an d 24. By contrast, only weaker sp(2)-sp(2) sigma bonds could form in unobse rved concerted transition structures leading to products 28 and 32, formed in the nonconcerted rearrangements of 18 and 19.