The superior energy density of antimatter annihilation has often been point
ed to as the ultimate source of energy for propulsion. However, the limited
capacity and very low efficiency of present-day antiproton production meth
ods suggest that antimatter may be too costly to consider for near-term pro
pulsion applications. We address this issue by assessing the antimatter req
uirements fur six different types of propulsion concepts, including two in
which antiprotons are used to drive energy release from combined fission/fu
sion, These requirements art: compared against the capacity of both the cur
rent antimatter production infrastructure and the improved capabilities tha
t could exist within the early part of next century. Results show that alth
ough it may be impractical to consider systems that rely on antimatter as t
he sole source of propulsive energy, the requirements for propulsion based
on antimatter-assisted fission/fusion do fall within projected near-term pr
oduction capabilities, In fact, a new facility designed solely for antiprot
on production but based on existing technology could feasibly support inter
stellar precursor missions and omniplanetary spaceflight with antimatter co
sts ranging up to $6.4 x 10(6) per mission.