The accuracy of ear-canal admittance and reflectance as measures of the ear
's properties depends on the acoustic effects of the canal. Here, measureme
nts of acoustic admittance at different canal locations in domestic cats ar
e used to test three common assumptions. (I) Can a uniform-tube model of th
e canal represent spatial variations in admittance? Data from cats support
this assumption for frequencies below 3 kHz, where the admittance inferred
at the tympanic membrane (TM) based on a uniform-tube model differs by less
than 3 dB in magnitude and 0.07 periods in angle from the admittance measu
red at the TM; for higher frequencies greater differences occur. (2) Do lar
ge static air pressures in the canal make the middle ear rigid without affe
cting the properties of the canal space? The measurements reported indicate
that large negative static pressures reduce the low-frequency compliance o
f the cat middle ear to about 10% of the compliance of the canal air volume
. Static displacements of the: acoustic probe, TM, and canal walls with sta
tic pressure may affect estimates of the canal volume and middle-ear compli
ance by as much as 15% to 20%. (3) Is the acoustic-reflectance magnitude co
nstant with position along the canal? Reflectance data from cat ear canals
generally support this idea, except within a frequency region near 0.5 kHz
for which there is evidence of energy loss. These results demonstrate that
noninvasive measurements in the canal describe middle-ear acoustic properti
es to within tolerances that depend on the effects of the canal. (C) 2000 A
coustical Society of America. [S0001 -4966(00)00509-9].