The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts

Citation
Mr. Jackson et al., The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts, J VASC SURG, 32(3), 2000, pp. 498-504
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
498 - 504
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(200009)32:3<498:TCOAFF>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objectives: Although there are numerous reports comparing saphenous vein (S V) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with respect to the patency rates for femoropopliteal bypass grafts, the clinical consequences of failed grafts are not as well described. This study compares the outcomes of failed SV an d PTFE grafts with a specific emphasis on the degree of acute limb ischemia caused by graft occlusion. Methods: Over a 6-year period, 718 infrainguinal revascularization procedur es were performed, of which 189 were femoropopliteal bypass grafts (SV, 108 ; PTFE, 81). Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiov ascular Surgery (SVS/ISCVS) standardized runoff scores were calculated from preoperative arteriograms. Clinical categories of acute limb ischemia resu lting from graft occlusion were graded according to SVS/ISCVS standards (I, viable; II, threatened; III, irreversible). Primary graft patency and limb salvage rates at 48 months were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier m ethod. Results: Patients were well matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Chroni c critical ischemia was the operative indication in most cases (SV, 82%; PT FE, 80%; P = .85). Runoff scores and preoperative ankle-brachial index meas urements were similar for the two groups (SV, 6.0 +/- 2.5 [SD] and 0.51 +/- 0.29; PTFE, 5.3 +/- 2.8 and 0.45 +/- 0.20; P = .06 and P = .12). The dista l anastomosis was made below the knee in 60% of SV grafts and 16% of PTFE g rafts (P < .001). Grade II ischemia was more likely to occur after occlusio n of PTPE grafts (78%) than after occlusion of SV grafts' (21%; P = .001). Emergency revascularization after graft occlusion was required for 28% of P TPE failures but only 3% of SV graft failures (P < .001). Primary graft pat ency at 48 months was 58% for SV grafts and 32% for PTPE grafts (P = .008). Limb salvage was' achieved in 81% of SV grafts but only 56% of PTFE grafts (P = .019). Conclusions: Patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafting with PTPE are at greater risk of ischemic complications from graft occlusion and more frequently require emergency limb revascularization as a result of graft o cclusion than patients receiving SV grafts. Graft patency and limb salvage are superior with SV in comparison with PTFE in patients undergoing femorop opliteal bypass grafting.